We recommend "Landscape" print layout.
Jesus Christ Cannot Be Mocked
By
Carman Bradley
A
liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel. - Robert Frost
Authentic Christian witness in Canada has been tragically trampled under the popular cultural
rushes of religious pluralism, inter-faith dialogue, liberal ecumenism, spiritual syncretism, and religious liberalism. Even more heart-breaking is the realization that most of the push for these unorthodoxies is self-generated within the professed Christian Body. It is a sad
testimony to the condition of Canadian Christendom that believers need to be
reminded of who they believe in, what Christ said regarding people who profess His
lordship and what He said about the condition and destiny of
non-believers. God will not be mocked. Those
who profess to be Christians; those who have been redeemed and regenerated in
Christ, cannot in good faith be neutral or indifferent to the status of the
unsaved and to the Great Commission
(Matthew 28:18-20). Jesus Christ is neither
a sectarian guru nor a non-sectarian sage. He has never been broadminded about the fate of non-believers or the celebration of other faith "traditions." And there is nothing "ceremonial" about the Holy Spirit. Spiritual unction is not graciously showered upon the believer through ritual, but through demonstration of a contrite obedient heart, turned towards Jesus Christ and accepting of His will. Jesus Christ brought victory over the emptiness of religious ritual. Let's not suggest that somehow sharing faith traditions will garner His blessings. In His parable of the Shepherd and His Flock, Christ testifies to His divinity, His
purpose, the status of those who recognize His “voice,” and the unfortunate fate of those who follow false “shepherds”:
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He
that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other
way, the same is a thief and a robber.
But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear
his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out. And when he putteth forth his
own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his
voice. And a stranger will they not
follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers. This parable spake Jesus
unto them: but they understood not what things they were which he spake unto
them. Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep. All that ever came before me are thieves and
robbers: but the sheep did not hear them.
I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and
shall go in and out, and find pasture.
The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I
am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd
giveth his life for the sheep. But he
that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth
the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them,
and scattereth the sheep. The hireling
fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep. I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the
Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.
And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must
bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd. Therefore doth my Father love me, because I
lay down my life, that I might take it again.
No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to
lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I
received of my Father (John 10:1-18). [My
underline]
In
the parable of The Vine and the Branches Christ
details the intricacies of Christian conversion and the beneficial outcome assured
on the Day of Judgment:
I am the true vine, and my Father is
the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he
taketh away: and every branch
that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit. Now ye are clean through the word which I
have spoken unto you. Abide in me, and I
in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine;
no more can ye, except ye abide in me. I
am the vine, ye are the
branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much
fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is
withered; and men gather them, and cast them
into the fire, and they are burned. If
ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it
shall be done unto you. Herein is my
Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples. As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in
my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye
shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide
in his love. These things have I spoken
unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full (John 15:1-11). [My underline]
In
his first letter the Apostle John detailed the crucial relationships between God
the Father, Jesus Christ His Son, “love” and our faith:
Hereby know we that we dwell in him,
and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit. And we have seen and do testify that the
Father sent the Son to be the
Saviour of the world. Whosoever shall
confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God. And we have known and believed the love that
God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and
God in him. Herein is our love made
perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so
are we in this world. There is no fear
in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that
feareth is not made perfect in love. We
love him, because he first loved us. If
a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth
not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
And this commandment have we from him,
That he who loveth God love his brother also.
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the
Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also
that is begotten of him. By this we know
that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his
commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the
world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he
that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only,
but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the
Spirit is truth. For there are three
that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these
three are one. And there are three that
bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these
three agree in one. If we receive the
witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God
which he hath testified of his Son. He
that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth
not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave
of his Son. And this is the record, that
God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God
hath not life. These things have I
written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know
that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of
God (1
John 4:13-5:13).
[My underline]
In
striking contrast to the guidance given in the few excerpts above are the
following quotes, which are examples of the popular (but unchristian!) opinion that
places higher value on religious pluralism, non-sectarianism and spiritual
syncretism, than on carrying-out Jesus Christ’s commands:
No Religion is an island
There is no monopoly on holiness.
No Religion is an island,
We share the kinship of humanity,
The capacity for compassion.
The hand of God is extended to all who seek
Him,
He is near to all that call upon him in
truth.
God’s Spirit rests upon all, no matter what
their beliefs,
Man, or woman in consonance with their
deeds.
The creation of one Adam promotes peace,
No one can claim:
My ancestry is more noble than yours.
There is no monopoly on holiness;
There is no truth without humility.
Let us help one another overcome hardness of
heart,
Opening minds to the challenges of faith.
Have we not all one God? Are we not all His
children?
Let us not be guided by ignorance or
disdain.
Let lives of holiness illuminate our paths.
Together let us strive for Tikkun Olam , the mending of our world.
Together let us strive for peace and understanding for all peoples.[i]
-
Alan M. Schwartze, Chairman, Canadian Council of Christians and Jews
I had just finished performing my
Jum’a namaz (Friday prayers) on the shores of the Mediterranean sea and as I
looked around me, I was filled with peace and the wonder of being here a long
way from my native Pakistan and my adopted home, Canada. I was in
Barcelona to attend the 4th Parliament of World Religions with two friends and
partners in interfaith - Reverend
Dr. Karen Hamilton, a practicing Christian [United
Church of Canada], and Barbara
Siddiqui, born in Midland as a Christian and now a practicing Muslim.
It was an unusual situation in many
ways. Two white women wearing shalwar qameez were praying with me and a
host of diverse Muslims, in a VIP tent set up by the Sikh community of
Birmingham, England. We were joined by local media keen to see how-Muslims-pray
(thank God men and women prayed together!). However they were thoroughly
confused when a turbaned Sikh and some non Muslims came and joined the prayer.
This was interfaith at it’s best . Karen reminded me of the book both of us
have just read and discussed: "The Dignity of Difference", by
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks in which he describes the differences of the world -
differences of religion, ethnicity, language and belief as part of God's
particular and intentional plan. “The differences of our world reflect
and mirror the truth that we are made in the image of the God who is infinitely
various and who delights in variety” says Karen. The ad-hoc Imam said
in his sermon “Humanity is one Community” and certainly at this point in time,
anyone would agree.
The 2004 Parliament of World Religions was organized in partnership with the
Universal Forum of Cultures Barcelona 2004 (which runs from May to
September) and in association with the UNESCO Centre of Catalonia. 8000
Religious and spiritual practitioners from all over the world converged to
Barcelona to greet and meet each other in peace. 400 carefully selected
seminars, workshops, performances and films were offered in the PWR program.
They addressed three core themes: Sustainable development, Cultural
diversity and Conditions for peace through spiritual practice, religious
identity, and intra- and inter-religious dialogue. The Forum was supported
by the presence of people like The Archbishop of Barcelona, Dr. Abdullah Omar
Nasseef (President of the Muslim World Congress), Ela Gandhi (granddaughter of
Mahatama Gandhi), Rabbi Henry J. Sobel (Chief Rabbi of Brazil) and many more.[ii] [My underline]
-
Raheel
Raza, Canadian Council of Muslim Women,
Report on the 4th Parliament of World Religions
To the extent that
the Buddha, Moses, Elijah, Isaiah, Krishna, Mohammed, Confucius, Julian of
Norwich, Catherine of Genoa, Hildegrad of Bingen, Rosa Parks, Florence
Nightengale, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Buber, Thich Nhat Hanhn, Dag Hammarskjöld,
or any other holy person brings life, love, and being to another, then to that
degree that person is to me the word of God incarnate. No fence can be placed
around the Being of God. The suggestion that Jesus is of a different kind of
substance and therefore different from every other human being in kind instead
of in degree will ultimately have to be abandoned. Then the realization will
surely begin to dawn that to perceive Jesus as different from others only in
degree is to open all people to divine potential found in the Christ-figure. It
is to invite all people to step into power of living fully, loving wastefully,
and having the courage to be all that any one of us can be – a self-whole,
free, real, and expanding, a participant in a humanity without boundaries.[iii]
- Episcopalian Bishop, Rev. Dr. John Shelby Spong
Our society is
multicultural, our world is multifaith; our church community has varying
theological perspectives within it. Some make exclusive claims to
absolute truth and find in these claims authorization to do harm…While
believing that our faith is grounded in truth, our truth need not deny the
truths of others.[iv]
-
FAITH TALK II: A DRAFT STATEMENT OF FAITH FOR DISCUSSION AND
RESPONSE,
Committee on Theology and Faith, The United Church of Canada
Wake up
brothers and sisters in Christ! The revelation found in
Apostle Paul’s second letter to Timothy warns us:
I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall
judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach the word;
be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all
longsuffering and doctrine. For the time
will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts
shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall
turn away their ears from the
truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an
evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry (1 Timothy 4: 1-5).
Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is not a so-called "Western faith tradition!" Jesus
Christ cannot be treated as some malleable deity, fashioned by human interest,
the reflection of self-serving human projection. Jesus Christ cannot be reduced to a mere
saintly human to be re-imaged as desired to keep pace with so-called “increasing
human consciousness.” The uniqueness of
Jesus Christ cannot be compromised for the non-sectarian goals of the CCCJ, for initiatives like the Parliament
of World Religions, or for the politics of World Federalism and the World Conference of Religions for Peace. Jesus Christ cannot be “demoted” to
the equivalent of an Old Testament prophet or a gifted sage like Mahatma Gandhi for the sake of
political goals like religious harmony and equality. Moreover, the domain of Jesus Christ (God’s
Kingdom) cannot be partitioned along religious, political or cultural
lines, i.e. exclusive of Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs, communists, atheists or
leftists, for example. Professed
Christians, who entertain the notion of alternate routes to salvation (alternate
paths to God) or teach that there are human beings who are exempt from Christ’s
judgment, are spiritually blind and make Christ out to be a liar. They make a mockery of Christianity. Bearers of such theology are deceived. They do not have the Spirit in them:
And we have seen and do testify that
the Father sent the Son to be
the Saviour of the world. Whosoever
shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God (1 John 4:14).
There
is a huge difference between promoting religious tolerance for public safety
and civility and proselytizing spiritual indifference. Standing up with confidence, humbly and respectfully
to give voice to one’s values and spiritual beliefs while also showing
consideration for your neighbour’s right to differ in opinion displays wholesome
tolerance. On the other hand, leaning
over the fence and agreeing with your neighbour that his Bahá’í faith (for
example) is equal to Christianity, makes Jesus Christ out to be a liar
and the Gospel to be a hoax. When so-called
“practicing Christians,” like the Reverend
Dr. Karen Hamilton and her denomination - The United Church of Canada, place value in the notion of religious
equality – “believing that our faith is grounded in truth, our truth
need not deny the truths of others,” they are displaying hugely unloving indifference.
They profess a sameness among religions that
contradicts the core of Christ’s revelation.
From what source do these religious liberals (professed believers!) draw
confidence in the safe eternal destiny of the non-believer? By their passive witness religious liberals are
culpable in the damnation of their non-believing neighbours (Matthew 28:18-20, John 15:18-27).
Drawing from the wisdom of Robert Frost quoted at
the beginning of this article; one must ask the religious liberal what logic is
there in holding a belief about the Creator of the Universe, if you don’t hold
it to be “universally” true? Is this not
like declaring to a friend, “I believe Christ died on the Cross to save my
soul, but I am not sure if He did the same for you, maybe your soul will get
saved some other way; to tell the truth, I guess salvation is determined by
what you think”? And what would the religious
liberal say if his friend replied, “I am a secular humanist”? Furthermore, if one does hold something to be
true, what integrity is there when the person doesn’t have enough confidence or
motivation to defend his belief under criticism or religious comparison? This “anything goes” mind-set makes a mockery
of monotheistic faith. What does adherence to religious liberalism or liberal ecumenism say about that person’s respect for scripture
and reverence for Christ?
Moreover, when religious liberals assert as absolute
truth that there are many truths, are they not committing intellectual
suicide? Is it not irrational, if not
deceitful, to assert that there are many religious truths; that United Church
theology need not deny the truths of others; and yet explicitly deny the Gospel
truth that Jesus Christ says He is the only way to avoid God’s wrath on
the Day of Judgment. Again, from what
source do these religious liberals (professed believers!) draw confidence in
the safe eternal destiny of the non-believer?
Not the Apostle John, who recorded:
Thomas
saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the
way? Jesus saith unto him, I am the way,
the truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father, but by me (John 14: 5-6).
Charge
thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick
and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom (I Timothy 4:1)
Any believer, who does not to care about his non-believing
neighbour’s destiny - eternal separation from God, needs to examine the
authenticity of his “Christian” beliefs and ponder the whereabouts of the Holy
Spirit. With so many truths to believe
in, how do religious liberals find certainty in their own spiritual status
before God? Their already evident answer
serves to further prove their spiritual blindness – they profess the notion
that all in the end will be saved; a monumental heresy from the Christian
Worldview.
Canadian society is religiously diverse. However, treating this diversity of religions
with zero discrimination, as if Gnosticism, Wicca and Christianity are equal
belief systems is not an idea inspired by the Holy Spirit. Professed believers who publicly subvert
the Christian Worldview in an attempt to avoid the label bigot, to avoid being
seen as discriminating or biased against competing faiths are lukewarm
Christians (Revelation 3:15-16) at best, deceivers at worst. Removal of the Christian underpinnings to
Canadian governance over the recent decades has been a secular, humanist,
non-sectarian triumph, which has succeeded primarily because of the
liberal-mindedness of many and the apathy of others within the overwhelming
Christian majority - at least 76 percent of Canadians.
In sum, inter-faith endeavours that promote the
idea of equivalency among religions do harm to the Christian witness and are
acts of rebellion before God. Religious toleration
in a civilized society can have merit. On
the other hand, spiritual indifference is never right. The moment that Christians think it is no
longer necessary to pray for their neighbour’s salvation in Christ, because the
neighbour’s Bahá’í faith will save him, we put Christ back on the Cross; we act
as if His suffering by crucifixion was in vain; we imply that the gift of His resurrection
(and thus our salvation) never happened
or isn’t needed by all human beings. Demonstrations
of religious liberalism with the non-sectarian notion of harmonizing acceptance of pluralistic
beliefs or creating some syncretism of
world spirituality is fundamentally flawed thinking and a tremendous grievance
to the Holy Spirit, no matter how sincere or well-meaning the offenders.
Christians must stand for the authentic Gospel and stop
fellowshipping with deceivers and non-believers (II Corinthians 6: 14-16). Here “fellowship” posits spiritual
likeness, unity and equality in Christ and is defined as a special relationship
between Christians who are regenerated members of the family of God and who are
united in cooperation to do the work of the Lord. Christians are called to respectfully witness
the Gospel of Jesus Christ to non-believers – Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs,
Buddhists, Jews, atheists, all mankind, and we want to lovingly associate with
these men and women to accomplish this; but believers are only to fellowship
among God’s elect (Ephesians 4: 4-6). Believers
desiring to dignify other world religions by attempting to fellowship with
and celebrate the spiritually of adherents to Islam or Buddha (for example) have
a severe trade-off dilemma. They can
only dignify the faiths of their Muslim and Buddhist friends by disparaging the
Gospel of Jesus Christ. Christians need
to respect the right and freedom of all to profess the religion of their
choice; and here “respect” means “show consideration for,” not “revere,”
not “deem equal.”
Al Islam, official website for the Ahmadiyya Muslim
Community, respectfully explains the absolute incompatibility of
the Christian Worldview with that of the Muslim Worldview. It is a sad reality when Muslims profess to a
better understanding of the boundaries of Christian faith than Canada’s senior very right reverend clergy do. Under the title, “The Belief in the Prophets,”
the Al Islam text reads:
Apart from Islam, none of the divine
books of religions bear testimony to the truth of the founders of other
religions. The absence of any recognition of the truth of prophets other than
their own has insulated religions from one another, each one claiming to
monopolise truth, each viewing the prophets of other religions as impostors.
Although in everyday life we do not find this expressed in such strong terms, the hard reality remains, that if the followers of any religion take their
beliefs seriously, they have to consider all other religions to be false, even
at their sources. It is impossible to conceive a Christian, a true believer in
Christianity as he understands it today, who would testify to the truth of
Buddha, Krishna and Zoroaster. Particularly, the Christian stance against the
Holy Prophet (sa) of Islam is exactly the one mentioned above; they have to
denounce him as an impostor, otherwise the only alternative for them is to
become Muslims. The orientalists discussing this subject have always
maintained this position very clearly, many among them having gone to the
extent of showing undisguised hostility towards the founder of Islam on the
premise that he had to be false. The same applies to other religions alike.
Although in everyday life we do not
come across such glaring examples of discourtesy and insult, but whether one
keeps one's views to oneself or expresses them openly, the barrier still
remains. It is evident from this that the followers of all religions have
compartmentalised themselves against all others, and the barrier between truth
and falsehood, right or wrong does succeed in preventing the religious harmony
so much needed by man today.
Of course, there are very civilised
and educated Christians in the world, who out of courtesy would not offend the
sensibilities of Muslims by denouncing the Holy Prophet (sa) of Islam as an
impostor. However the Christians, in accordance
with their beliefs, have no option but to reject the truth of the founder of
Islam.[v]
[My underline]
The Holy Bible clearly establishes the difference between
the Son of God and a holy prophet. The Apostle John recorded this truth in the following lengthy extract:
In the beginning was the Word, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and
without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light
of men. And the light shineth in
darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
There was a man sent from God, whose
name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness
of the Light, that all men
through him might believe. He was not
that Light, but was sent to
bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light, which
lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew
him not. He came unto his own, and his
own received him not. But as many as
received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his
name: Which were born, not of blood, nor
of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and
dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of
the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John bare witness of him, and cried,
saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred
before me: for he was before me. And of
his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace. For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus
Christ. No man hath seen God at any
time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath
declared him (John 1:1-18).
The
next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God,
which taketh away the sin of the world.
This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred
before me: for he was before me. And I
knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I
come baptizing with water. And John bare record, saying, I
saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to
baptize with water, the same said unto me, upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit
descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy
Ghost. And I saw, and bare record that
this is the Son of God (John 1:30-34).
There was a division therefore again
among the Jews for these sayings. And
many of them said, He hath a devil, and is mad; why hear ye him? Others said, These are not the words of him
that hath a devil. Can a devil open the eyes of the blind? (John 10:19-21)
And it was at Jerusalem the feast of
the dedication, and it was winter. And
Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon’s porch.
Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost
thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly. Jesus answered them, I
told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father’s name, they
bear witness of me. But ye believe not,
because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and
they follow me: And I give unto them
eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them
out of my Father’s hand. I and my Father are one. Then
the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
Jesus answered them, Many
good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye
stone me? The
Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for
blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. Jesus answered them, Is
it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? If he called them gods, unto whom the word of
God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;
Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world,
Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? If I do not the works of my Father, believe
me not. But if I do, though ye believe
not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in
me, and I in him. Therefore
they sought again to take him: but he escaped out of their hand, and went away
again beyond Jordan into the place where John at first baptized; and there he
abode. And many resorted unto him, and
said, John did no miracle: but all things that John spake of this man were
true. And many believed on him there
(John 10:22-42).
If they could have their way, how would key leadership and membership in
the following organizations attempt re-image Jesus Christ for the sake of global harmony and manmade peace?
Canadian Council
of Churches (CCC):
President: The Rev. Dr. James Christie, United Church
Vice-President: The Very Rev. Dr. Marion Pardy, United Church
General Secretary: The Rev. Dr. Karen Hamilton , United Church
World Federalist
Movement:
President: The
Very Rev. Dr. Lois M. Wilson, United Church
Council Chair: The Rev. Dr. James Christie, United Church
Council
Member: The
Rev. Dr. Karen Hamilton, United Church
Interfaith
Committee on Canadian Military Chaplaincy:
UCC Member: The Very Reverend Dr. David
Giuliano, United Church
CCC Member: The Rev. Dr. Karen Hamilton, United Church
World Council of
Religions for Peace:
Co-President: The Rev. Dr. Karen Hamilton,
United Church
Canadian Council
of Christians and Jews:
Board of Governors: The Rev. Dr. Karen Hamilton, United Church
Parliament of
World Religions:
Attendee: The Rev. Dr. Karen Hamilton,
United Church
We
can draw considerable insight on where these “leaders” would take Canadian
Christendom (if their prayers were fulfilled) from recent United Church declarations,
and indeed, from their own words.
In
the 1992, Moderator, The Very Reverend Marion Pardy, summarized the UCC position
on inerrancy of Bible in a report titled “The Authority and Interpretation of
Scripture.” She said:
Members
are to engage the Bible to experience the liberating and transforming word of
God…with an awareness of our theological, social and cultural assumptions…with
a sense of sacred mystery and in dynamic interaction with human experience,
understanding and heritage…trusting God’s Spirit to enliven our understanding
and to empower our acting.”[vi]
In
1997, Moderator, The Right Rev. Dr. Bill Phipps, denied Christ’s divinity,
saying: “No I don’t believe Christ was God.”[vii]
In January 2003, Rev. Dr.
Karen Hamilton, General Secretary of the Canadian Council of Churches, was the
guest speaker at the 41st Annual Meeting of Oxford Presbyterial United Church
Women, held at Dundas Street United Church, Woodstock Ontario. The theme for the day was "Interfaith
Dialogue." With over 150 members
attending, Rev. Dr. Hamilton spoke on "The Children of Abraham, Sarah and
Hagar". The Newsletter of Oxford Presbytery of the United Church of
Canada records:
The "Interfaith Dialogue"
topic gave Karen the chance to speak about Christianity, Judaism and Islam as
they most directly connect to the biblical text. Christians share the Old
Testament with the Jews but it is reordered. Muslims do not share our text but
share our stories. Jesus is highly revered as an important prophet. The
Mother of Jesus is very important as a model and holy figure. All three believe that God has commanded that
we help the poor. In these complex times
we must learn to work together as a church and learn about and understand each
other. We must listen and hear what each
other is saying. She said that God works through flawed and fragile human
beings ...."God is at work, God is in charge." Abraham, Sarah and
Hagar are flawed and fragile humans as seen in Genesis chapters 12 and 21. Their
story is portrayed in the books, "The Red Tent", and
"Abraham". Abraham is the
Father of all three faith communities- Jews, Christians and Moslems. God's message to us is," Do Not Be
Afraid".
Karen spoke about some remarkable
women that she knows and has worked closely with in her ministry, one Jewish
and two Muslim. She has learned that the foundation of our worship comes from
Judaism and we know little about our biblical roots. There is a great
importance placed on ritual in all three faiths. The uniqueness of
the three faiths must be upheld. The different groups must celebrate
together to build better relationships. Karen's parting thought
was..."Don't just talk about it! Do it!"[viii]
[My underline]
In
August 2003, Rev. Dr. Allen Churchill (not a religious liberal) wrote:
Our
own United Church is in a state of free fall…76% of our theological professors
think it is not important to affirm Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord.[ix]
In April 2004, Rev. Dr.
Donald Faris (not a religious liberal) wrote:
With the approval of gay,
lesbian, and bisexual marriage - the foolhardy blessing of behavior that God
condemns - the paganization of the United Church is almost complete.[x]
And in July 2004, Rev. Dr. Karen Hamilton attended the 4th
Parliament of World Religions in
Barcelona Spain. Raheel Raza, a “friend
and partner in inter-faith” who also attended the Parliament quoted Rev.
Dr. Hamilton as saying:
It was humbling, it was challenging,
it was inspiring. All of the words of the songs, in whichever of God's
languages they were heard, all of the rhythms - the beat of the Japanese drums,
the whirl of the Sufi dancers, the clapping of the Gospel choir, the call for
peace in Hebrew and Arabic by Sheva, a Jewish-Muslim band, the chant of the
Buddhist monks - proclaimed the truth - Hallelujah, God is Great! The call to
all of us is to continue, with every breath we take, every word we speak, every
hand we touch to proclaim the depth of that truth.” [xi]
Raheel
Raza further describes the experience:
As the Sufis started chanting Allah Hu, there was a hush, and then a few
people joined in and I trembled as I heard more than half the audience chanting
Allah Hu with the Sufis. The moment was sublime the
message eternal and beyond barriers of faith, culture or nationality. We were
people of faith bound by our belief in God. The concert ended with 10 children
of 10 traditions holding up peace lights.[xii]
Finally,
in 2005 the United Church Committee on Theology and Faith released a draft
statement of faith for discussion and response titled, FAITH TALK II. The
document asserts: that Jesus Christ is not the only way, truth and life;
the Bible is not really authoritative; the Trinity is deconstructed into a
pluralism of new-age lexicon including “Bond of Love;” the Talk denies
the Day of Judgment, denies original sin, asserts that all shall be saved - “Divine
creation does not cease until all things have found wholeness, union, and
integration with the common ground of all being;” and denies the Law
(Christian moral code) – “Scripture is not too hard to live out, nor far
off, nor in heaven, that we should say, who will go up for us to heaven, and
bring it to us that we may hear it and do it.”[xiii]
Faith Talk II states:
The Spirit fills creation in diverse ways and makes the Divine knowable,
not only to us but also to others. We understand faith as an experience
common to humanity, as a shared response to God’s self-giving; and we know that
our own and other’s expressions of faith are often distorted by insecurity,
intolerance and hatred. How others perceive God is often foreign to our
perception. The breadth of Spirit calls us away from isolation to
consider the Spirit’s freedom of movement beyond our experience and, however
our expressions of faith may differ, to act toward all with the same love by
which God acts toward us.
And on their website under "Overview of
Beliefs," the denomination declares:
The United Church of Canada views the religious
practice of all people of goodwill with respect and gratitude. We believe the
Spirit of God is at work in many different faith communities.
For Christians, Jesus is the way we know God.
Our understanding is nonetheless limited by human imagination. God is greater
still and works in our world by a mysterious Spirit that knows no distinction
at the doorway of a Christian chapel; Buddhist, Hindu, or Sikh temple;
Aboriginal sweat lodge, Muslim mosque, or Jewish synagogue.
We work together with other Christian churches
whenever possible, and among people of other religions in Canada and throughout
the world on matters of justice, peace, and human dignity.
Today, difference is everywhere around us and, we
believe, a great cause for celebration.[xiv]
Be not
deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also
reap! (Galatians 6:7)
The Gospel of Jesus Christ is not a human projection "limted by human imagination." The Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ and God the Father are "One." There is no mysterious breadth of Spirit. Only those who place little value in God's Word as recorded in the Bible would imagine such a thing. Only those who do not recognize and acknowledge the divine revelation in the Son of God and person of Jesus Christ would imagine such a thing. Only those bereft of the counsel of the Holy Spirt would imagine such a demoted re-imagined Christ. There will be no breach
of the ineffectual status quo witness
within Canadian Christendom; there will likely be no national revival, until
authentic believers have separated from the deceivers and ended all fellowship with apostasy. There will likely be no national revival
until many authentic believers have repented of their longstanding indifference
to the witness of these deceivers. ..."Don't
just talk about it! Do it!"
Copyright © 2008 StandForGod.Org
[ii] CCMW Report on the 4th Parliament of World Religions,
July 2004, Barcelona, Spain, The Wisdom of Listening, the Power
of Commitment, Barcelona, July 7--13, 2004, By Raheel Raza, http://www.ccmw.com/activitites/act_eventattended_Barcelona.html,
09/05/08.
[iii] John Shelby Spong, A New Christianity
for a New World (San Francisco: Harher, 2001), p.147.
[iv] FAITH TALK
II: A DRAFT STATEMENT OF FAITH FOR DISCUSSION AND RESPONSE, Committee on Theology and Faith, The United Church of
Canada, January 2005.
[ix]
Allen Churchill, “At The Crossroads,” CONCERN, Vol.XIV No. 3, 10 August
2003, p.6. Adapted from his Presidential Address at the 12th
Annual Meeting of COC.
[x]
Don Faris, speech titled “THE PAGANIZATION OF THE UNITED CHURCH,” before
the Community of Concern AGM, April 29, 2004.
[xi] CCMW Report on the 4th Parliament of World Religions,
July 2004, Barcelona, Spain, The Wisdom of Listening, the Power
of Commitment, Barcelona, July 7--13, 2004, By Raheel Raza, http://www.ccmw.com/activitites/act_eventattended_Barcelona.html,
09/05/08.
|